Published on: September 18, 2024
IMPACT OF EMERGENCY PROVISIONS ON CENTRE-STATE RELATIONS
IMPACT OF EMERGENCY PROVISIONS ON CENTRE-STATE RELATIONS
Federal Structure of Governance in India
- Federation Overview
- India is a federal republic with power divided between the Central and State governments.
- The Seventh Schedule of the Constitution delineates powers between the Union and States.
- State Responsibilities
- States are primarily responsible for maintaining law and order within their jurisdictions.
Emergency Provisions
- Part XVIII of the Constitution
- Articles 355 and 356 outline the emergency provisions.
- Article 355
- Purpose: Duty of the Centre to protect States from external aggression and internal disturbance.
- Ensuring Constitutional Operation: Centre must ensure that States operate in accordance with the Constitution.
- Article 356
- Purpose: Allows imposition of President’s rule if a State government fails to function according to the Constitution.
- Comparison: Unlike U.S. and Australia, India’s Constitution includes provisions for removing State governments.
Historical and Legal Perspectives
- B.R. Ambedkar’s View
- Article 355’s Role: To prevent arbitrary use of Article 356.
- Intended Use: Article 356 was expected to be rarely used.
- Judicial Rulings
- S.R. Bommai Case (1994)
- Article 356 should only be invoked for a breakdown of constitutional machinery, not just law and order.
- Imposition of President’s rule is subject to judicial review and should not be politically motivated.
- Evolution of Article 355
- Initial Interpretation: Narrow view in State of Rajasthan Vs Union of India (1977).
- Widened Scope: Expanded in later cases (e.g., Naga People’s Movement, Sarbananda Sonowal) to include all actions necessary for protection and constitutional compliance.
- S.R. Bommai Case (1994)
Recommendations and Current Context
- Commission Recommendations
- Sarkaria Commission (1987), National Commission (2002), Punchhi Commission (2010)
- Article 355 imposes a duty and grants power to the Union for effective performance.
- President’s rule under Article 356 should be a last resort for extreme situations.
- Sarkaria Commission (1987), National Commission (2002), Punchhi Commission (2010)
- Current Situation in Manipur
- Violence and Disturbances: Large-scale violence, attacks on civilians, and looting.
- Political Context: Same party in power at both Centre and State has led to non-invocation of Article 356.
- Recommended Actions: Continued pursuit of Article 355 measures to restore normalcy.