Published on: April 13, 2024
WILDLIFE ‘CAPTURE’ AND ‘RESCUE’
WILDLIFE ‘CAPTURE’ AND ‘RESCUE’
DEFINITION OF RESCUE
- Act of saving or being saved from danger or difficulty
- When it comes to wildlife, the term ‘rescue’ conjures up a sense of hope for the survival of the animal, the drama of the operation, admiration for the skills of human responders, and an acknowledgment of the struggles of coexistence.
CONTEXT
- Human-Wildlife Interactions in India
- The frequency of human-wildlife interactions in India is increasing.
- Conflict with wildlife is inevitable and needs better solutions than reactive capture and relocation.
- Challenges of Reactive Approaches
- Reactive methods like capture and relocation are often unsustainable or harmful to animals.
- Distinguishing between wildlife rescue and capture is a nuanced challenge.
- Complexities of Successful Capture
- Successful capture involves various techniques like chemical and physical immobilization.
- Expert teams with specific roles are crucial for capturing animals safely.
- Scenarios Requiring Rescue
- Actual rescue situations include animals like leopards, elephants, and snakes in precarious situations like wells, tanks, or homes.
- Separated elephant calves also require rescue.
- Not Every Encounter Requires Rescue
- Wildlife sightings outside typical habitats don’t always need rescue.
- Wildlife causing minor disruptions like livestock killings or crop damage may not warrant capture.
- Effective Conflict Management
- Effective responses don’t always involve capture or relocation.
- Proactive conflict management aims to mitigate tense situations without harming animals.
IGNORING THE GUIDELINES
- Central Government Guidelines
- Guidelines discourage capturing leopards or elephants based solely on sightings.
- Emphasize preventative measures over capture, with capture as a last resort.
- Ignored Advice
- In practice, the advice to avoid capture unless necessary is often overlooked.
- Recent incidents highlight the consequences of ignoring this advice.
- Case Study: Elephant in South India
- Elephant captured from a coffee plantation under the guise of rescue.
- Released far away, leading to straying and subsequent capture attempts resulting in its death.
- Case Study: Leopard in Balrampur
- Leopard ‘rescued’ from an agricultural field but died shortly after.
- Shows the illusion of labeling every capture as a rescue.
- Recommendations for Better Practices
- Adhere to government guidelines on wildlife management.
- Prioritize preventative measures and only resort to capture when absolutely necessary.
- Ensure captured animals are released in familiar habitats to avoid distress and further conflict.
SNAKE MANAGEMENT
- Misconceptions
- Confusion between capture, removal, and rescue is evident in snake conflict management.
- Snakes have a high frequency of interactions with humans, leading to various management issues.
- Poor Handling and Unnecessary Removal
- Increased interactions result in poor handling of snakes during so-called ‘rescue’ operations.
- Snakes are often unnecessarily removed from habitats and relocated to unfamiliar areas.
- Survival Challenges After Relocation
- Relocated snakes have low survival rates in unfamiliar environments.
- Relocation does not resolve conflict and may lead to increased conflicts in the vacated area.
- Harmful Effects of ‘Rescue’ Operations
- ‘Rescue’ operations can cause physical trauma, injuries, and stress to snakes.
- These factors compromise the animals’ chances of survival post-release.
- Reconsidering the Concept of ‘Rescue’
- The term ‘rescue’ implies a threat to one species from another or from human activities.
- This perception can lead to villainizing parties and undermine conservation efforts.
- Moving Towards Holistic Community Integration
- Instead of divisive practices, we should integrate humans and animals in community management.
- Long-term conservation goals require holistic approaches that consider both human and non-human needs.
THE KARNATAKA EXAMPLE
- Realistic Conflict Resolution
- Begin conflict resolution with a realistic assessment of the situation.
- Identify the problem, limit stress factors for animals, exhaust proactive measures, and base interventions on ethical considerations.
- Proactive Mitigation Strategies
- Prioritize proactive measures to avoid conflicts before they occur.
- Examples include early warning systems, monitoring, fencing, lighting improvements, public education, and waste management.
- Examples from Karnataka
- Karnataka Forest Department implements promising strategies like early warning systems and public education.
- These strategies aim to reduce conflicts and prepare communities for wildlife interactions.
- Considerations in Relocation
- Relocation disrupts ecosystems and has significant animal welfare implications.
- Effective conflict resolution should consider animal welfare alongside relocation strategies.
- Seeking Win-Win Solutions
- Strive for conflict resolution approaches that benefit both humans and animals.
- Focus on leaving everyone better off through thoughtful and ethical interventions.